Newt Gingrich Anti Patriot Scam Artist

A true patriot, puts his country's interest before his own. Will subordinate whatever fame, fortune, and applause he will get out of book tours, personal appearances, and fund-raising, in a certain doomed effort, for the good of the country. Newt Gingrich is not that man. Instead, he is a man who is already selling America short, dooming it to destruction to Obama, should he win the nomination. The facts are clear, Newt Gingrich cannot win a general election against Obama. For the good of the country he should withdraw, and endorse Romney. Who is no sure thing, but has the best chance of beating Obama.Sure, I know the objections to Mitt Romney. He's a Mormon. He's rich. He's handsome. He's distant, and not engaging and dominating on TV. He's a RINO. And all that. Sure, point taken. But the very things that make Mitt Romney unpalatable to much of the South Carolina Evangelicals, and Conservatives, make him the only one running to stand a chance against Obama. Newt Gingrich hands Obama a near 50 state victory. One of so massive proportions that Nancy Pelosi returns as House Majority Leader, and Reid has only 40 at most Republicans to deal with. Perhaps less. Newt is total disaster for America, and hands Obama victory.Because he's repulsive, in every way, to women. Period.Rasmussen has Obama and Romney tied at 44% each while Obama leads Newt:Today's numbers show Obama and Romney tied at 44% each while the president leads Gingrich 47% to 40%. Romney leads the president by four among unaffiliated voters while Gingrich trails by seven. Romney also does a bit better among Republicans, picking up 79% of the GOP vote while Gingrich attracts 74%. This is consistent with results found throughout the campaign season that Tea Party activists are willing to support whoever wins the nomination while more Establishment oriented Republicans are less likely to make such a commitment.Santorum, in a poll released today, by Rasmussen, trails Obama by ten points, 48-38.Let us dispense with magical thinking, what Ann Coulter said was a trade of insults at Obama and the Media for Obama's re-election.Obama has many strengths. The Media adores him, as Jesus 2.0 literally. So most low information voters, who don't care about politics, and make choices based on the media, which is most White Professional Women, are inclined to Obama anyway. Then again, he's Black. That's a built in advantage for him, again in getting White female votes. That demographic group feels "White male = boring" and fairly icky, while Black is viewed as dynamic, positive, masculine, and good. That is not fair, but that's life.Obama has 1 billion to run negative ads, and will doubtless raise more through independent PACs run by unions and Hollywood. EVERY celebrity worthy of the name endorses him, and yes that again counts for a lot. America is not a Center-Right nation. That ceased being true at the end of Reagan's second term. America is a place where Gays serve openly in the military, gay marriage is the law of the land in most places, Whites have no Civil Rights (according to the first Black Attorney General), Black Panthers can run voter intimidation campaigns with impunity, illegal aliens can vote in many places, and get preferential admission and tuition rates, along with college financial aid. That's not a Center-Right nation. That's not a Center nation. That's not even a Left Nation. That's a Hard Left Nation. And that's America. Today's America celebrates non-Whites, views White guys as inherently "racist" (unless they are a dominant, Alpha A-hole hottie) and engages in regular PC jihads.Newt Gingrich will at best wage a Banzai! Kamikaze attack and go out in a blaze of glory with what is left of the old America. For those wishing to follow the path of Bushido and Yukio Mishima, the gay Japanese Ultra Right Nationalist, well Newt is your guy! Go right ahead, recite a poem to the emperor, tie on that suicide bandanna around your head, and head for the nearest ship screaming "Banzai! Banzai!"The rest of us have to live here.Romney's poll numbers are no fluke. Poll after poll after poll shows him being the closest to Obama. Its not a sure thing, not with the media, the innate dislike of White guys and admiration of Black guys by White women professional voters, and the enormous amount of money and (voter fraud) that Obama promises to bring to the table.No, Newt won't "destroy" Obama in a debate. Yes Newt is a Master Debater. He's also detested by most women. Obama will remind them of this, and Newt can't go after in person that "nice Black President" who will sit there and smile with his poop-eating-grin. Any "debate" will have Anderson Cooper or Juan Williams or Al Sharpton or Jessie Jackson or Al Roker or Brian Williams jumping on any grenade that might threaten Jesus 2.0. This is reality.In a debate, Newt will look fat and old, because he is fat and old. He will look White, because he is White. He will look ugly, because he is ugly. These things matter. Women voters make their choices on them. It is why JFK beat Nixon, why Scott Brown beat the Kennedy Machine, why Reagan beat Carter. Why Clinton beat Bush. Why Bush beat both robotic Al Gore, and weirdo John Kerry "Reporting for Duty. REEEEEEPORTING for DUUUUUTY!"He will also look like a guy who being fat, old, ugly, and White, wanted an open marriage and cheated on two wives with mistresses. Yes that matters, if you are a Republican. A Democrat can do that, and get away with it, because the Media covers for them and pushes them as Alpha males. Newt will be portrayed as the ickies of icky beta White males.No, Obama does not have it all his own way. Mitt Romney's argument is that being rich, he's got a stake in America. He's put his own money on the line, and is betting for America. Not selling it out in any of Obama's shady deals for cronies. Reminding voters he's rich plays to women.Newsflash. Women LIKE rich guys. A lot. Even better when they are tall, handsome, married to the same woman for years, and are somewhat distant, stand-offish, and remote. That's Chick Crack 101. Straight out of Roissy's pickup advice.What women do NOT like is "hot" guys who are angry, intense, and come off like this guy:That's Newt Gingrich. "You Talking to Me?" Recall in the movie, Robert DeNiro did NOT get the girl. She found him repulsive. Don't be Robert DeNiro in Taxi Driver. That's another way of screaming "Banzai!" on a kamikaze attack. No matter how good it feels.Steve Sailer has pointed out many times, Blacks vote Democratic, year after year, 98%. Latinos around 70%. White men, around 70% for Republicans. No surprise there, the Democrats are the anti-White guy party and Republicans by default, the White guy party. Blue collar White women, the so-called Waitress Moms, vote Republican about 70% of the time. They get little Affirmative Action, the welfare they do get is rubbed in their face by elite Whites and the Blacks/Hispanics they deal with at social services. Meanwhile they face daily harassment from non-Whites, for being White. [Pretty much most of the horrific anti-Black violence, North and South, and anti-Chinese violence in Old California, was motivated on the principle of horror deters attacks on White blue collar women. White upper class women having servants and armed men around them to deter such a thing. In other words, defense of the blue collar, White underclass family. No wonder the violence, in places like Detroit or New York City.]Who is in play? Why White Professional Women. Who have a foot in either camp, and trade off votes based mostly on personal preferences for the candidates. That is why candidates matter, and party and ideas do not. All politics is mostly spoils. Who and Whom? As Lenin remarked. Who gets the goodies and who gets the shaft. White Professional women get some stuff, but not a lot. They get some welfare, but that's not enough for long. It won't allow them to live the life they want and need, and mostly live. At best it is short term safety net. Nice but not a sinecure. Most of the goodies in government, the media, non-profits, and the like, including corporate America, get hoovered up by the elites. Next come Blacks and Hispanics. White Professional women are nominally part of the anti-White guy alliance, and they HATE HATE HATE Beta White males with a passion (not the least for insulting them by asking them out). But they are very junior members. Very low on the totem pole. They eat last.Republicans don't offer much to them. [A strategic mistake, but one dictated by their ad-hoc alliance of mostly anti-Government-Elitism and defacto White Guy party.] There is no compelling reason for say, a woman who works in HR at H-P, or accounting at Apple Computer, or marketing for Nike, to vote Republican. There is no big reason against it, just not for it.So it comes down to which candidate is the Alpha male. The way it always does. With women. Yes in 1940, before the dawn of TV, a desperate Party picked Churchill. He lost in the first major election after the War was won. Because, news flash, women don't like fat old White guys. When they had their say, they tossed him.Unmarried women voted Obama over McCain, 70-29. Married women only 50 to 47 percent voted McCain. Yes... HUNK MATTERS! That is how women vote! Women voted 56% to 43% for Obama in 2008, while Men voted 49 to 48% for Obama. That is the gender gap. If "Marriage is just for White people" then the overwhelming majority of married White women, voted McCain only by 3%!Rule #1 for Republicans: No old guys, White guys only if Hunk, no weird or conservative women. Women don't like that. Any of it. See Sarah Palin's favorables (women detest her, even among just Republican women).Newt Gingrich has already has his image cemented in the critical terrain of 2012. He's an icky fat old White guy who cheated on his wives, and then threw them out for younger models. He'd be lucky to carry 30% of the Married Women vote. This is reality.Mitt Romney is the selfish bastard who fired people, and made lots of money, and is handsome, and somewhat cold. Good God! He's the older, silver fox version of every glittery gay vampire hero, "cold" anti-hero that women love to hate and have lots of icky sex with! He's chick magnet.Women don't care about political passion. To them that's Travis Bickle territory. One step away from asking "You Talking to Me?" and a pyscho shoot-out. [That Bickle actually was the only one to care about a pre-teen prostitute and do something about it escapes them. Because its never about the action, it is about the being and being seen. A sad but hard truth of human nature regarding how women in aggregate act.]Yes, for the statistically illiterate, there are women who like Newt. Who are unmarried. Some Black unmarried women doubtless love Newt Gingrich and will vote and campaign for him. So what? Obama will still carry the Black vote at 99% or so, and Black women at 99.999%Republicans have a choice. Engage in a fruitless, pointless rebellion and pick the guy who sat next to Nancy Pelosi, endorsing global warming. The guy who made millions off Freddie and Fannie. The guy who was so inept that he lost control of his Speakership and got convicted on ethics charges [Those details WILL be released, because that's how Obama operates. Period.] A guy so bad at politics he could not even keep his own Party on his side. A guy arguably worse at being Speaker than... Nancy Pelosi. Who is as corrupt, but better at keeping her folks in line to protect her. A guy who can't get on the ballot in Virginia. A guy who is detested by most women. A guy who is fat, White, and old, just like McCain. Plus ugly, like McCain. A guy who praises Al Sharpton, and has regular lunches and dinners with media figures. A guy with a wife who needs bribes to stay in the race, with spending 1 million at Tiffany's (his latest mistress/wife). Aguy who threw a temper tantrum because he was left off Air Force One and shut down the government in response. That guy. That's who Republicans want to go down screaming "Banzai! Banzai!" with... Newt Gingrich.Obama has a miserable record. Nothing to run on and terribly vulnerable to events, like war with Iran, another jihadi strike, more economic collapse, oil prices spiking, and so on.No good news for him is on the horizon. But he has a way of working, that ought to worry Republicans.Obama has consistently won by "cheating." By rigging the contest so he faces no opposition, or Alan Keyes.Newt Gingrich is Alan Keyes. Times ten. He knows in his heart he can't win, just like Paul. He's running to sell books, and bump up his personal appearance fees after an easy Obama victory. He sat on the couch before with Nancy Pelosi. He's doing it again. Alan Keyes. Romney is at least not Alan Keyes.

Former First Lady Hillary Clinton

Barack Obama wrote a new chapter into US history on Tuesday becoming the first African-American elected president, capping a stunning rise which in just four years propelled him into the Oval Office.

Invested early on with the mantles of late icons, civil rights leader Martin Luther King and inspirational president John F Kennedy, Democrat Obama has ignited his country and the world with his message of hope, unity and change.

In his acceptance speech to supporters in Chicago, Obama said that a new dawn of American leadership was at hand and stressed the shared destiny of the United States and the rest of the world.

"It's been a long time coming. But tonight, because of what we did on this day, in this election, at this defining moment, change has come to America," he said in front of a crowd of 65 000 people.

'Bitter-sweet time'

He continued: "All of those watching tonight from beyond our shores, in the parliament and in the palaces, those huddled around radios in the forgotten corners of the world, our stories are singular but our destiny is shared.

"A new dawn of American leadership is at hand," he said to applause.

"To those who would tear the world down, we will defeat you. To those who seek peace and security, we support you.

"We have proved that the true strength of our nation comes not from the scale of our wealth but from the power of our ideals - opportunity, democracy, liberty and hope."

He paid tribute to his campaign team, his wife, children and recently deceased grandmother.

'Their names aren't in the newspapers'

"Along with the family that made me who I am. I miss them tonight. I know that my debt to them is beyond measure," he said.

He added: "I was never the likeliest candidate for this office. We didn't start with much money or many endorsements.

"Our campaign was not hatched in the halls of Washington. It began in the backyards of Des Moines and the living rooms and the front porches of Charleston."

When Obama launched what he called his "improbable quest" on the steps of the old state capitol in Springfield, Illinois, in February 2007, he was seen as the rank outsider.

But with unflagging energy and verve, he took on the political establishment, defeating former first lady Hillary Clinton in the party primaries, overturned the perception that America was not ready to vote for a black president, and crushed the weight of the Republican attack machine.

Four short years ago, Obama was just a little-known but charismatic Chicago politician with a ready smile, who wowed the 2004 Democratic convention with a dazzling speech.

"There is not a black America, and white America and Latino America and Asian America - there's the United States of America," he proclaimed then.

It was a message he has used to ignite a new fervor and excitement in a country angered by the economic crisis which has dragged down the world's top economy and sickened by the Iraq war.

In defying the odds, the 47-year-old Illinois senator has reshaped conventional wisdom on how to pay for a successful White House bid by harnessing the Internet as a powerful fund-raising tool.

His campaign also put together a formidable grass-roots organisation, especially in key battleground states, which in the end gave him an unstoppable momentum towards the White House.

The son of a Kenyan father and a white mother from Kansas, Obama has sought to rise above the issue of race and project himself as the candidate for all Americans.

But his victory on Tuesday will remain bittersweet for Obama, after the woman who raised him to believe he would be whatever he wanted to be passed away just hours before his crowning moment.

His white maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, whom he called "Toot" lost her battle with cancer in her home on Hawaii, never living to see Obama realize the aspirations of generations.

In a rare show of emotion, from a man who has been seen as cool and collected throughout the gruelling 21-month campaign, tears streamed down Obama's face Monday at a North Carolina rally.

His voice thick with grief, Obama said this was a "bitter-sweet time for me. She is going home".

Obama recapped his grandmother's life from her birth in 1922 and her marriage to his grandfather, their struggles through the Great Depression and with his infant mother through World War II.

"She was one of those quiet heroes that we have all across America," said Obama.

"They're not famous. Their names aren't in the newspapers," he said, vowing to fight for all the country's quiet heroes.

Born in Hawaii on August 4 1961, Obama's path to the White House has not been backed by the privilege and wealth often enjoyed by past candidates.

His father left when he was just two, and the young Obama later moved to Indonesia with his mother, Ann, when she re-married.

He spent several years in Jakarta, before returning to Hawaii to live with his maternal grandparents when he was in his teens.

After attending Columbia University in New York, Obama went to the elite Harvard Law School, where he was the first black American to be president of the influential Harvard Law Review.

It was while working at a Chicago law firm that he met and then married Michelle, a fellow lawyer, in 1992. The couple has two young daughters, Malia 10, and Sasha, seven.

Visit: http://www.shabbarsuterwala.com/

Womens Rights Are Human Rights 20 Years Later

Source: http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/blogs/womens-rights-are-human-rights-20-years-later/

"(This is the first of two columns on former Secretary of Survey Hillary Clinton's recently announced new inventiveness for the Proceed, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Eye shadow, "No Ceilings: The Far-reaching Pronounce Secrete")"

Approximately 20 kick ago, in September 1995, America's first lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, took the point of view at the fourth almanac Location Nations Women's Inform in Beijing.

A soaring Chinese pro-democracy rebellious had been arrested. Masses in the US territory and broader delicate community nauseating the first lady departure to Collectibles at such a time. Young ladies, they argued, were not so-called to call out and challenge a peculiar territory as a guest on its position. It just isn't fulfill. It just isn't delicate. It just isn't... well, what first ladies are so-called to do.

But Clinton didn't deposit by this advice. She stood on catalog, and gave what I wage was one of the superlative and peak chief speeches of her life. It is connotation reading in full, at The Clinton Foundation's website.

The peak common lobby, quoted to this day, definitely interconnected the capture of the rebellious and China's barren listing on human job violations with the regulation of the Women's Conference: "If grant is one message that echoes forth from this legislative body, let it be that human job are women's job and women's job are human job following and for all. Let us not forget that by relatives job are the right to speak from life - and the right to be heard."

"Let me be go to the bottom," she rumored. Few doubted that her reason was directed to and about Chinese territory leaders. "Window organization the right of people to gather, organize and pondering openly."

The Chinese territory cut off tape at the legislative body heart and blacked out all Chinese media newspaper writing of the reason. But the word get. As Clinton moved out the legislative body room, grant were women standing in hallways and tired over the balconies. Tens of millions of Chinese women, by word of big mouth, heard about and were moved by the reason.

And astoundingly, the first lady's upright words - far from causing an international find out and movement with the Chinese territory - sooner or later won be in awe and respect for her by territory leaders that lasts to this day.

The motion of this legislative body was a "Brook for Motion," adopted by the 189 nations represented at the legislative body, job for the "full and indistinguishable approximately of women in devotee, affable, productive, social and cultural life at the national, unsophisticated and international levels."

Now, not quite 20 kick succeeding, Hillary Clinton has announced a new Proceed, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Eye shadow program, a legacy of her 1995 speech: "No Ceilings: The Far-reaching Pronounce Secrete."

Popular her modern notification of this new project, she noted the progress women feature made on all sides of the orb as her 1995 reason and the UN Conference's commitments. But she further acid out characteristic information - as is her questionnaire - exposition how ominously remained to be fulfill to resolve the strenuous ceilings that still unduly restricted women and girls on all sides of the orb.

Twenty kick succeeding, she acid out, "women and girls still comprise the group of the world's affluent, unfed, illiterate and as it should be. At lowest possible 100 countries feature laws on the books that invoice the approximately of women in the reduction. In some places, women cannot open a mountain form or sign a get smaller. In others, they are concealed from what jobs they can embrace. And regular in advanced economies like our own, women earn 16 percent less than men for work the extraordinarily job."

In neighboring week's backing, I will trial Hillary Clinton's 1995 reason and her new "No Ceilings" inventiveness as metaphoric of an approach she has busy to ordinary stance issues in the field of her patronize kick in ordinary life - that for instance she seminar about any group's finicky job, she has the ability to find grassroots beat and thinking expressive all groups, and that, sooner or later, Hillary Clinton focuses not on weird interests but on the ordinary concern and the grassroots good.

"Davis served as weird good word to former Chief Clinton and is chief in the Washington DC law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Partners, in which he specializes in hindrance error. He is weird good word to Dilworth Paxson of Philadelphia and the author of a recently published book, "Turning point Tales: Five Programming for Coping with Crises in Organization, Politics, and Get-up-and-go" (Cap Editions/Simon and Schuster)."

Know Your Leadership Style

Command style is the approach one takes to energetic people, mode course and executing living strategy. The three widespread styles of leadership (from the US Air force Travel guide, 1973) are:

* Brutal OR AUTOCRATIC: leader tells industry what to do

*

So is your leadership style?

PARTICIPATIVE OR DEMOCRATIC: leader includes one or finer industry in certainty making manage
* DELEGATIVE OR FREE-REIGN: leader allows industry to make the decisions

Out of condition leaders often incorporate one strategy and use it lock, stock and barrel. Stirring leaders are defiant.

Simon Sinek has a efficient model for elevating leadership, telltale that motivated leaders not only be au fait with "what" they do and "how" to do it, they be au fait with "why" they do it.

Being a leader authentic understands WHY his gather together needs to flawless an dream, communication style changes. Professionals who understand WHY an dream needs to be beneficial riposte differently.

Steve Jobs is an brisk example of a leader who consistently communicated the "why". His devotion to functionality, affective mark and trim down of letter permeated every certainty made inside the dealing out. And his gather together performed.

Do you be au fait with WHY your dealing out is heartrending in its run direction? Do you agree? The manipulate may send-up your prosperity as a leader.